Home Blog Page 3816

PDP Refuses To Give Presidential Nomination Forms To Aspirants

Two members of the People’s Democratic Party, PDP stormed the national secretariat of the party to pick their presidential nomination forms and the Expression of Interest forms, but the party declined to give them.

PDP said it printed only one presidential nomination form and Expression of Interest form and that it was reserved for President Jonathan who had been adopted as the sole presidential candidate of the party.

The presidential aspirants are Abduljelil Tafawa Balewa, son of the former Prime Minister, and a female presidential aspirant, Prof. Akasoba Duke–Abiola, from Kalabari in Rivers State.

She claimed to be one of the wives of the late acclaimed winner of the June 12, 1993, election, Chief MKO Abiola.

But both of them were denied the presidential nomination forms and the Expression of Interest forms and asked to come back tomorrow as the presidential forms were not ready.

The son of the former Prime Minister, Belawa told journalists that he obtained a Zenith Bank draft of N20 million for the nomination form and N2 million for the Expression of Interest form, but he was turned down by the officials of the party.

According to Balewa, “I came to the national secretariat of PDP in Wadata House Wuse Zone 5 to obtain my presidential nomination form and Expression of Interest form. I presented to the officials a N20 million presidential nomination teller obtained from the Zenith Bank and another teller of N2 million from the same bank for the Expression of Interest form, but after turning me around from the office of the National Chairman and the National Organising Secretary, I was eventually asked to come back again on Thursday.”

The Zenith Bank account number to which he paid the sum of N22 million, he said is 1012436478.

On why he was asked to come back, he said: “They said the presidential nomination and Expression of Interest forms were not ready as they are busy with the governorship and National Assembly forms.”

According to the PDP presidential aspirant from Bauchi State, “I met the National Secretary and the National Organising Secretary and I was asked to come back on Thursday because the nomination form and Expression of Interest form are not ready.”

When asked why he is picking the presidential nomination of the PDP bearing in mind that the PDP National Executive Committee (NEC) had adopted President Jonathan, he said: “I did not come here on my own. My supporters numbering over 40 million Nigerians comprising the masses, civil society groups are solidly behind my aspiration. I not am fronting for any one and will never front for anyone. My supporters are the downtrodden. These are the people I represent.”

Also speaking, Abiola, who threatened to go to court to enforce her fundamental human rights, said she paid the recommended fee of N2 million Expression of Interest form from the Diamond Bank.

According to her, “The national chairman of the PDP and the National Organising Secretary told me that they printed only one presidential nomination form and that the form is meant for President Goodluck Jonathan who is the sole presidential candidate of the party.

“To me, this is unacceptable. How can a political party as big as the PDP with many followers print only one presidential nomination form, whereas in the guidelines that was made public, there was no place the party said only one presidential nomination form would be printed.

“I have paid for Expression of Interest form because I am exempted from the payment of N20 million and the law of equity said that when a payment is made, it would be followed by a service. What is happening is a misrepresentation and manipulation of what PDP stands for. I am not asking that I should be given back my money. I am asking that I be given the presidential nomination form that I have paid for. This is what equity stands for.

“As I speak now, there is no vacancy in Aso Rock. The Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria says there shall be vacancy in Aso Rock, once every four years and this is why I paid and obtained for the presidential nomination form.”
She threatened that if she is not given the presidential nomination form, she might resort to court to enforce her fundamental human right.

Breaking: FIFA Postpones Verdict On NFF Crisis Till Friday, October 31

World football governing body, FIFA, has given Nigeria until Friday, October 31, 2014 to resolve the crisis in the Nigeria Football Federation or face a lengthy ban from all football related activities.

In a letter addressed to Amaju Pinnick who was duly elected as the president of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) at the September 30 elections in Warri, Delta State, Secretary General of FIFA, Jerome Valcke, said that the world football body extended the grace period for Nigeria from yesterday till Friday as an opportunity to avoid a lengthy ban.

“This gives Nigerian football a last opportunity to avoid a lengthy suspension. We inform you that if by Friday 31 October 2014 at midday Nigerian time we have not received proof that the case (the Jos Federal High Court ruling that sacked the Pinnick led NFF board) has been definitively withdrawn from court and that the board elected on 30 September 2014 is able to carry out its activities without any hindrance, we will refer the case to the FIFA Emergency Committee for implementation of the suspension,” observed the statement from FIFA yesterday.

FIFA said that it was aware of the order granted by the Federal High Court in Jos nullifying the NFF elections of 30 September 2014 and the fact that some persons claiming to have been legitimately elected previously went to occupy the offices of the NFF, thereby causing great confusion among the administrative staff .

“We also note that security forces prevented you (Pinnick) from travelling to Namibia where you were supposed to represent the NFF at the final match of the African Women’s Championship.

“As stated in our previous letters dated 9 September 2014 and 2 October 2014, , FIFA stressed that should the electoral process and the instalment of the newly elected NFF board be affected by any interference, the case would be brought to the attention of the appropriate FIFA bodies for a suspension of the NFF until the next FIFA Congress due to take place on 28 and 29 May 2015,” it further warned.

Valcke insisted that the activities of those parading themselves as factional NFF board members clearly shows that interference has not ceased in the administration of Nigerian football.

It also warned of the dire effects a suspension could have on Nigerian football. FIFA said that It would for instance mean that no team from Nigeria of any sort (including club teams) could have any international sporting contact (art. 14 par. 3 of the FIFA Statutes).
But it would also mean that neither the NFF nor any of its members or officials could benefit from any development programmes, courses or training from FIFA or CAF any longer.

Chambers Umezulike Writes About African Capitalism, ‘Economic Growth Without Human Development ‘

Although I am not happy saying this as an African, but I think very deeply inside of me and very convincingly that 80% of all the African countries have failed woefully; economically, politically and socially since their various independence dates. I think that most African countries and leaders are not serious. I am bitter about this fact.

Many African countries got their Independence around the 1960s, more than 5 decades ago; and till now, many of them have barely anything to show that they have been able to govern themselves better and make life better for their citizens. They have not been able to achieve enormous feats nor take their countries to greater heights since their independence. The past and present leaders of many of these African nations have not even been able to build a nation-state; e.g. there are so many states in Africa but there are not so many nation-states. Most of these countries have so many ethnic groups and many African leaders have not been able to harmonize these different ethnic groups in their respective countries to build a nation-state. During elections, there are so many ethnic tensions, and leaders are chosen in most African countries based on ethnic sentiments. And after elections in many African countries, there are always ethnic-influenced protests and killings here and there.

So, most African leaders past and present have not been able to harmonize their countries into having common values; feeling of belongingness or oneness; collective goals; pursuit for greater good of country and not ethnic group; and pursuit for the glory of whole country. Most African countries got their independence alongside countries like South Korea, Malaysia, and Singapore which were third world countries. Comparing these countries, economically and socially; with most African countries, their contemporaries around the 60s, is like comparing 1 Zimbabwean dollar with $1. Agriculture for example has been grossly neglected in most African countries, maybe until lately. Around the 60s, Africa was leading the world Agriculture wise, and has most of her Gross Domestic Products (GDPs) built on solely Agriculture, but not same today. Africa has a lot of arable lands, but African countries are today the greatest importers of food in the world. Agriculture contributes like 3% of United States of America’s GDP, and many African countries import most food products from the United States of America currently. Most African economies are not diversified in any sense. The countries that have petroleum products like Nigeria are solely dependent on just Oil economy wise. Major manufacturing is low or not happening in most African countries at all and most African countries are still battling with common developmental essentials like steady electricity, water, efficient public transportation, efficient health care; and the citizenries of most of these countries still live below less than a dollar a day. Currently, most African countries have the highest number of patients that troop to the United States of America, India, Germany and so many other countries for most severe ailments. Then the Human Development Indexes (HDIs) of most African Countries are the lowest in the whole world.

Politically also, most African countries have failed in terms of leadership. Corruption has been a serious menace and most African leaders have helped to institutionalize it. Most African countries have had leaders that were not prepared for leadership, and came in thinking about enriching themselves alone. Regardless of the military coups that brought in so many military leaders in most African countries, in the past, most especially, I think that African countries have been most unfortunate with very terrible and dumb leaders. I mean, where are the African examples of “Lee Kuan Yew” that “single-handedly” transformed and changed the story of Singapore?

Africa is one of the wealthiest continents in the world in terms of natural resources, but the poorest in terms of every other thing, a case in point is the Democratic Republic of Congo which is the richest country in the world but the second worst in terms of HDI. Singapore, South Korea, Malaysia etc. have nothing in terms of natural resources to be compared with that of most African countries. By the 2014 HDI estimates of 187 countries; Democratic Republic of Congo with all her natural resources for an example has the HDI of 0.338 (186th); Nigeria, the largest economy in Africa has the HDI of 0.504 (152nd); Ghana, 0.573 (138th); Côte d’Ivoire, 0.452 (171st); Ethiopia, 0.435 (173rd); Kenya, 0.535 (147th); Uganda, 0.484 (164th); Namibia, 0.626 (127th); Zambia, 0.561 (141st); Mozambique, 0.393 (178th); Central African Republic, 0.381 (185th) etc. The few countries that managed to be within High Human Development are: Libya, 0.784 (55th); Mauritius, 0.771 (63rd); Seychelles, 0.756 (71st); Tunisia, 0.721 (90th); and Algeria, 0.717 (93rd).

Starting like this, because of the corruption of many African leaders, and their unseriousness, the delivery of public services and Welfarism have also been seriously left out over time. Inequality rates in most African countries are thick. Now there is a great wave of international capitalism that started from the West sweeping across the world. And Africa is following suit and prouding herself of not being left out. Most African countries have Free Market based Economies; governments are not supposed to interfere with the prices of goods and services. The prices of goods and services are being determined by market forces. This is good in terms of encouraging entrepreneurship; failure of public institutions to run factors of production, after years of neglect and abuse; and having the private sector to run factors of production efficiently, and provide employment and economic growth. A terrible fact however is that many African economies have been growing rapidly based on their GDP’s (nominal), but the HDIs are not coming up as well. For an example, the GDP of Nigeria is $522 billion but the HDI is 0.504 (152nd); Morocco’s GDP ($105 billion), HDi (0.617, 129th); Kenya’s GDP ($55 billion), HDI (0.535, 147th); Tanzania’s GDP ($34 billion), HDI (0.488, 159th); Cameroon’s GDP ($27 billion), HDI (0.504, 152nd) etc. This is an acute contrast to countries I used previously in my comparisons, like South Korea (GDP, $1.449 trillion; HDI, 0.891 (15th)); Malaysia (GDP, $367.712 billion; HDI, 0.773 (63rd)); and Singapore (GDP $295.744 billion; HDI, 0.901 (9th)); where HDIs are growing with GDPs. Most economists and the elite in Kenya have been so happy that Kenya’s economy has been termed a “middle income” economy. But the question remains, what this means to a corn-roaster at Ngara, a neighborhood in Nairobi, or a poor farmer, very far away. Or what it would mean in their lives, even in 20 years time?

That means there are serious economic growths in some African countries but there are no human development. Standard of living is so low in so many countries; and many African countries are claiming middle income economies. The inequality gap is thickening. This is because the political and economic sectors are run by the elite, the same people. In most instances, the politicians, when they have left power would now become the proper business men.

Currently, public services and Welfarism are being neglected by most governments currently, and most governments are removing subsidies of commodities like petroleum etc. based on the advice from IMF, World Bank etc. I can never deny the fact that a thriving of the private sector is the best way for most African countries to get out of their prolonged mess but there are still very clear roles of the public sector; there are certain things the governments should provide, and governments should not neglect their roles in providing these things. Public institutions are dying in many countries. Public schools and hospitals are dying in most countries because of the mentality that these things should be left for the private sector alone.

In Nigeria for an example, you would be seen as a joker if you send your ward to a public primary or secondary school. Because, most of these public schools are dead. And the unimaginable amount of money that parents spend per term at these public schools is something else. I went to public primary and secondary schools. My primary school education was free, and I got quality education through passionate and good teachers, in a very conducive environment. My life today is built on that education. But this is not the case today; parents pay more than $500 per term at various privately run primary schools in Nigeria especially in Abuja and Lagos. You can imagine this. Then most of the public secondary schools are very much dead because of the government’s neglect and the sudden and rapid increase of privately run secondary schools helped to bring about mass cheatings in West African Senior Secondary Certificate, National Examination Council, and Joint Admission and Matriculation Examinations. The examination papers for these exams leak every morning across the federation during these exams, and most secondary school students do not read again during these very important exams. Then the elite that can afford it, send their wards to big privately run secondary schools for quality education and where they pay more than $1,000 per term, in most instances. Then most public universities are dying also. Our father’s generations went to these public universities and always tell us stories about how good these universities were then, how emphasis were on quality education and conducive environment. The failure to sustain this however has given rise to privately run universities, run by mostly pastors and big politicians where students pay unimaginable sums of money to attend because the public universities have been neglected in every sense: poor infrastructures; and always marred by strikes by Academic Staff Union of Universities and Non-Academic Staff Union of Universities. Currently, there is this whole wave of Nigerians going for university education abroad because the public universities are dying pretty fast. Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe went to a university in the United States of America because Nigeria had no university then and for quality education, decades later, Nigerians troop abroad for quality education. The best university in Nigeria is the University of Ilorin, a public university, and this university is the 20th in Africa based on the 2014 Webomectrics ranking of African Universities; for you to understand what I am saying. Nigeria, with all her oil money, cannot boast of the best public university in Africa for example.

Then you would be seen as a joke if you go to a public hospital in Nigeria for medical treatment, because most of them have been long neglected, with doctors that run their own private hospitals down town, and use the time they should have spent in these public hospitals where they were employed by the government, to run their private ones. I have cases of thousands of people that died not attended to, in these public hospitals during emergencies. Then the medical bills from these privately run hospitals are something else. If the public hospitals are working, at least the have-nots could afford going there for cheaper bills. These are common and essential things the government should provide. So to get the best services, education and health wise, one would have to go to the privately run institutions, and especially only the “haves” can afford this. Millions of Nigerians cannot afford visiting these privately run institutions. Many Nigerians have died from lack of money to travel abroad for major ailments like cancer and kidney cases. The elite in Nigeria (politicians, public office holders, wealthy business men) all go abroad for medical treatments, all of them. Including the president, his wife, former presidents, governors and key government officials all go abroad for medical treatment shamelessly. Many Nigerian politicians, all died abroad while seeking for medical treatment over severe ailments because Nigeria cannot boast of public hospitals that could take care of some major ailments. It is saddening that Nigeria with all her oil money cannot boast of one of the best hospitals in the world. The only crime in Nigeria is to be within the “have-nots.” And this is largely the case in most African countries.
In ideal capitalist environments like in the United States of America, the public hospitals and schools are the best; equipped to the teeth; affordable, cheap, with subsidies and scholarships for the “have-nots”. These public institutions create a balance; and make competition between them and the privately run ones active. That is what it should in an ideal Capitalist environment. I do not know from where most African leaders got the idea that public institutions should die because of Capitalism.

Moreover, another ugly fact is that most of the leaders in Africa that should make these Markets entirely free in the actual sense of Capitalism are the business people or have allies in the business sector. In most cases, during elections, the allies give them moneys to rig and bribe themselves through and when they get into power; they would have to reciprocate by given these business allies contracts and allowing them to have the monopoly of producing or importing very essential commodities. So you have the Markets not being truly free again. There is serious monopoly in the importation and production of very essential commodities in most Africa countries. In Nigeria, a former Vice President has one of the costliest private universities in the country. Politicians own private schools, estates and hospitals.

Then corruption sets in, because the Internally Generated Revenues that governments should generate from taxing these privately run institutions are not been used in most instances to deliver public goods, the way it should be in Capitalist economies. Corruption takes away these taxes. In Europe, when you pay tax, you see the results the next day, but in most African countries, civil servants that have been paying taxes for years, for example, cannot point to anything and say that their taxes brought this. And based on poor legislative and judicial institutions, governments are not been held accountable for things like this.

So in African Capitalism, the poor keeps getting poorer and the rich richer. The poor ones, in millions, cannot get good health care or go to good schools in most cases, because the public institutions that should be thriving, cheaper, are not there to create a major balance. The elite are just the ones controlling everything while the masses are so impoverished. Welfarism is totally neglected. Public Institutions are dying. Unlike in so many countries in the Scandinavia and Europe that have the best HDI’s in the world, and have their HDIs growing with their GDPs, like: Norway’s HDI is 0.955 (1st); Sweden, 0.898 (12th); Denmark, 0.900 (10th); Finland, 0.879, (24th); Germany, 0.911 (6th); Netherlands, 0.915 (4th) etc., there is a provision of public services: schools, hospitals, housing, transportation etc. Education, health care are free in most of these places and prices of essential commodities are very low. Some of these countries have economies that were built on Welfarism, why can’t African countries borrow from their model? They have been able to humanize their capitalism, even in almost all the countries in the West like the HDI of Australia is 0.933 (2nd); Switzerland, 0.917 (3rd); United States of America, 0.914 (5th); Ireland, 0.899 (11th); New Zealand, 0.910 (7th) ; Canada, 0.902 (8th) ; Belgium, 0.881 (21st); Austria, 0.811 (21st) etc. They tell African countries to remove all the subsidies here, for their economies to thrive, while they have a lot of it over there like the Structural Adjustment Programs experiences that caused inflation in so many African countries; caused intense poverty; caused great fall in the standard of living of so many people; made a lot of people lose their jobs; and messed up the social sectors through currency devaluation, higher taxes, lower government spending, rise in food prices, and cutting of wages. An average European has a good shelter, electricity, good food, efficient transportation etc., though they have gone far in economic growth and development for decades, their governments’ efforts, consciousness in making these provisions available, for almost everyone can never be neglected. They have capitalist economies but public services and Welfarism were never neglected. And people are living fairly well.

I do not have any issues with Capitalist economies, but African leaderships should not be carried away by this. There should be a bit of public deliveries and Welfarism. Economic growth without human development can never work. It is not by going to Davos and speaking good grammar, or showing everyone economic statistics or having smart finance Ministers that borrow all the Western economic principles and come and heap them in Africa; but by clear facts about the living conditions of the people. Yes, I know about the trickle-down effect, but that might never work in Africa. Because Africans are so selfish, and it takes great time, and would take more time in the African context. People are grossly underpaid in most private institutions, there is abuse of labour; and I can feel the philanthropic presence of Bill Gate in Africa than that of all the richest African men combined altogether. African elite would prefer to go for shopping in Europe than in his or her country.

Africa has made a lot of mistakes and is about starting a whole set of new ones again. Economic growth without human development can never help African countries. It is never by saying that the GDP is growing by this and that percentage and leaders prouding themselves in this regards but by, the translation of this, to the living conditions of the African people.

It is time this becomes a concern to African leaders, the very fact that GDPs and HDIs are not working hand in hand, in most countries in Africa. Welfarism and public goods deliveries must be highly considered and not left out based on the wave of international capitalism, and based on the way African leaders are following it blindly. It’s not only by economic statistics but should be mainly by the standards of living of the African people.

____________________________________________________________________

Chambers Umezulike is a Nigerian Secular Humanist, Activist, and Writer. He is a co-author of the 1000 paged Nigerian centenary compendium: “The Metamorphoses of Nigeria (1914 – 2014),” a thorough work that chronicles stages of economic, political and social developments of Nigeria since 1914 that the British amalgamated her Northern and Southern protectorates.
Follow on twitter: @ClueXxxRdh;
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/chambers.umezulike
Email: [email protected]

Disclaimer

It is the policy of NewswireNGR not to endorse or oppose any opinion expressed by a User or Content provided by a User, Contributor, or other independent party. Opinion pieces and contributions are the opinions of the writers only and do not represent the opinions of NewsWireNGR.

PDP Tells Defected Speaker Aminu Tambuwal To Resign

The Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, has urged the speaker of the House of Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal, to leave office after Mr. Tambuwal officially announced his defection from the party to All Progressives Congress, APC, Tuesday.

The PDP said its National Working Committee has met with its leaders in the House of Representatives concerning the defection of the speaker, and after due considerations.

It said the speaker should do what is honourable since his new party is in the minority.

“After a thorough consideration of the matter, the NWC came to a conclusion that the Hon. Speaker, as a responsible elected officer, knows full well what is needful and honourable of him since his new party is in the minority,” a statement by the party’s publicity secretary, Olisa Metuh, said.

“We are not unmindful of the fact that Hon. Tambuwal became Speaker on the platform of the PDP as the political party with the majority of seats in the House of Representatives and that this incontrovertible fact has not changed.”

Speaker Tambuwal resigned today and immediately adjourned the lower house of assembly plenary till december 2014.

Ebola Scare: Australian Government Ban Flights From West Africa

To stop the spread of Ebola Virus Disease, the Australian Government has ban flights from West Africa, CNN reports.

Immigration Minister Scott Morrison announced “strong controls” on arrivals from West African countries affected by cases of the deadly disease.
Telling Australia’s parliament during a question time session Monday that his ministry was currently “not processing any application from these (Ebola) affected countries,” he said that the government was also suspending its humanitarian program.

He added that holders of permanent Australian visas based in these countries would be subject to a mandatory, three-week quarantine process prior to their departure. Visitors approved to travel to Australia will also face further screening and followup checks upon arrival.

The announcement came as a “surprise,” the Australian Medical Association (AMA) president Brian Owler told CNN, who said that the chance of the disease entering the country through a migrant from the region was very low.
“It’s not necessarily a very well-focused decision. The bigger picture needs to be on our preparedness at home but more importantly our involvement in West Africa itself, putting doctors and nurses and other logistical elements in place and trying to combat the crisis there.”
He added that the government had sought the advice of “very few people,” and had excluded the AMA.

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott said: “I not always agree with the Australian Medical Association, but I take them seriously and I think that the AMA invariably has the national interest at heart.”

The announcement that no refugees will be accepted from West Africa must be overturned, the Australian Greens have said.
“While the government drags its feet in responding to the Ebola crisis, Scott Morrison has slammed the door on West African refugees,” the Greens’ immigration spokesperson, Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said.

“The immigration minister’s crusade against those in need has spread to West Africa and is simply unacceptable.

“This miserly, selfish and cruel announcement from the government is not a reflection of our nation’s character.”

PDP Meeting With Principal Officers Of House Of Reps On Tambuwal

Following the announcement of the defection of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon Aminu Tambuwal to the All Progressives Congress, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is currently meeting with the leadership of the federal house of representatives to determine his fate.

According to Olisah Metuh, the national publicity secretary of PDP, the party would make its position regarding the development public after the meeting.

“We are in a meeting with the leadership of the house, the deputy speaker, the majority leader and all the principal officers from PDP,”

“We are discussing the issue and we will make our position public after the meeting.” 
Tambuwal who was elected as speaker on the PDP platform is interested in the sokoto gubernatorial seat.

I Have No Intention To Be Abia Speaker – Orji’s Son

Chinedum Orji, the first son of Governor Theodore Orji of Abia State, has said he is not planning to become the speaker of the Abia state House of Assembly in 2015.

Governor Orji had been accused of attempting to impose his son as the speaker of the state house of Assembly, this was immediately denied by the Abia state of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP)

He made this clarification at political stakeholders’ meeting of Ikwuano/ Umuahia federal constituency held yesterday at the Ikwuano country home of the PDP National Vice Chairman, South East, Col. Austin Akobundu (retd).

He said he was actually in the race to represent his Umuahia Central State constituency at the House of Assembly, but said his ambition had no connection with becoming the Speaker contrary to rumours.

According to him, becoming the Speaker would obviously cause friction between him and his father’s successor as unnecessary motives would be imputed into his actions by those wanting to curry favour with the governor.

Asked later in an interview if he would not accept the offer if prevailed upon by his colleagues, he vowed to turn it down, explaining that “it is good to balance political equation; somebody from old PDP divide has to be the Speaker”.

” I don’t want to be impeached, and if I become Speaker when I take any step, people will say I want to impeach the governor and become deputy governor, so, I don’t want my family to start having problems with my father’s successor.”

“Nobody can intimidate me out of my democratic rights because I am qualified and eligible to contest for the House of Assembly.”

Nigerian Fraudsters Bag 21 Years Jail Terms For N30m Scam [Pictured]

Justice Fatu Riman of the Federal High Court Kano today October 28, 2014 convicted and sentenced the duo of Mohammed Adam Mansur and Mohammed Auwal to twenty one years imprisonment after they pleaded guilty to the 3-count charge of conspiracy and obtaining money by false pretence preferred against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.

The convicts were arraigned by the Commission on July 9, 2013 for conspiracy and attempt to defraud one Alhaji Auwal Ayagi under the pretext that they were agents to Visafone Communications Limited, (Zoo Road, Kano outlet) and that their company wanted to purchase land from the complainant at the cost of N30, 000,000. They demanded 10 percent commission which they asked the complainant to pay into their bank account.

Upon arraignment they pleaded not guilty but, in the cause of trial, after the prosecution had called one witness, the duo dramatically changed plea and owned up to their crime.

Consequently, the prosecuting counsel, Idris Haruna urged the court to convict them accordingly.

Justice Riman consequently convicted the accused persons and sentenced them to twenty one years imprisonment each without option of fine. The sentence of the first convict who has been in prison custody since arraignment for failure to meet his bail terms is to start from the date of arraignment.

Fraudster 2

Breaking: $9.3m Deal; Presidential Committee Clears Ayo Oritsejafor, Asari Dokubo Asari

By PR Nigeria

Presidential Committee put together to unravel the mystery behind alleged involvement of President of Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) Ayo Oritsejafor and Alhaji Mujahideen Asari Dokubo in the botched $9.3 million arms deal in South Africa has cleared both men of any complicity in the matter.

A private aircraft belonging to Oritsejqfor last month conveyed some unnamed persons and the cash to South Africa ostensibly to purchase arms from the black market to help bolster Nigeria’s fight against terrorists in parts of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states.

This led to widespread speculations in the media and sentiments being expressed by politicians on the issue in Nigeria.

Three individuals on board were subsequently briefly detained in South-Africa while the cash was confiscated by that country’s financial authorities.

Weeks later, there were also insinuations that Niger Delta activist, Dokubo was one of those who flew in the plane.

However, authoritative sources have told PRNigeria, Nigerian government owned PR Firm that the secret panel cleared the CAN President, while also dismissing allegations that Dokubo was on the flight.

“A Special Team, comprising security agents, intelligence experts and officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has investigated the $9.3m cash-for- arms deal and submitted its report to the Presidency.

“The committee confirmed that the President of the Christian Association of Nigeria, Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor had no connection with the transaction.

“It was true that the CAN President’s jet was used but we found out that it was without his knowledge. As at the time in question, the aircraft was on lease. And you may be aware that the lease trend is peculiar to private jet owners in the country.

“It is the view of the committee that Oritsejafor cannot be held liable for any shuttle made by a lease firm.

“As for the manifest of the plane, the committee also discovered that the Niger Delta activist, Mujaheedin Asari Dokubo was not among those on board the transaction aircraft. There was no mention of Dokubo in the manifest presented during the investigation.”

The source expressed surprise that the matter was made public by South African authorities in the first place since an end user certificate duly signed by the Office National Security Adviser was presented by those who were on the plane.

“The committee’s findings revealed that the Office of the National Security Adviser (NSA) has the statutorily and legitimately mandate to issue end-user certificate for such arms transactions. The imputations surrounding the role of the ONSA were unfounded, baseless and ill-motivated.

“The decision of South Africa to return $15million to Nigeria lent credence to the legality of the transaction. Certainly, Nigeria had no case to answer”, the voice declared.

2015: Kwankwaso Declares Interest In Presidential Race

Kano state Governor, Rabiu Kwankwaso On Tuesday declared his interest to contest the 2015 Presidential elections on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC). He said the motivation for his interest is to serve and save the nation.

He made his declaration at a rally held in Abuja on Tuesday, the rally had in attendance, leaders of the party and some governors of the states ruled by the APC.

Declaring his interest to run, Governor Kwankwaso said that the crowd at the declaration ground from different part of the nation was a sign that Nigeria would remain united.

“Today, I take this call and formally declare my interest to seek for election as the APC Presidential candidate in the 2015 presidential election.

“It is only the APC that has what it takes to stop the misrule of the Peoples Democratic Party  and also has the power to reverse the decay that is suffocating our country.

“Our party is built with Nigerians in focus. We are the only party that practice internal democracy that believes that free and fair election is the only guideline to sustaining democracy.

“My crave to serve and save our country drove me to join in the race for the House of Representative, representing Kano State years ago,”

“The call to save our country has never been louder, clearer and more unambiguous than now. Governance has been reduced to incompetence and mediocrity.

“To save our country we must walk the journey however difficult,” he said.

Chelsea Look To Bounce Back As Capital One Cup Resumes

Chelsea Football Club will be looking to put their Sunday draw against Manchester United behind them and go back to winning ways when they face Shrewsbury away in a Capital One Cup fourth round tie Tuesday night.

On paper, the match should be a relatively easy one for the Blues; Shrewsbury is a league two side while Chelsea seat at the summit of the premier league.

Jose Mourinho is expected to make changes from the team that faced the Red Devils on Sunday. Injured striker, Costa trained yesterday (Monday) but won’t be fit in time for the game but Brazilian midfielder, Ramires who has been out injured may be making a return to the starting line-up.

 

Pius Adesanmi: President Hafsat Abiola-Costello?

On October 2, 2014, I was invited to the commencement of the 2nd University of Ottawa International Human Rights Film Festival. Because we are in the same city, there is a healthy brotherly rivalry between the University of Ottawa and my own Carleton University. No matter what the Maclean’s annual rating of Canadian Universities says, the question of which of these two is the superior University depends on who is telling the story. I am a Professor at Carleton University. I am telling this story. Got my drift? But I always feel honoured to be invited to events by our downtown “rivals”.

My honour at being invited by the University of Ottawa and sense of patriotic pride had a double layer on October 2. Not only was I invited as lead discussant of the opening film of such a prestigious festival, the said film is a 100% NAFDAC-certified Nigerian film. To have Nigeria open this film festival was one heck of a good news about Fatherland that I needed sorely. Any good news about or from Nigeria is always welcome even if one always needs an intergalactic telescope to find any strange beast called Nigerian good news.

We owe the focus on that Nigerian film to the organizers of the festival. The International Human Rights Film Festival is the brainchild of the Human Rights Research and Education Centre of the University of Ottawa. The festival is organized in collaboration with the Canadian Film Institute. Ottawa University’s Human Rights Research and Education Centre is one of the oldest and most prestigious of its kind in Canada and North America and this impressive pedigree is evident in the organization of the festival, as is the contagious efficiency of the Centre’s Director, Professor John Packer, a man with an extensive UN career in human rights, refugees, and international labour issues. The centre also boasts one of Nigeria’s bright promises in her graduate student cadre, Mr. Olabisi Delebayo Akinkugbe, who is rounding up his PhD in law.

With Professor John Packer, Mr. Bisi Akinkugbe, and Professor Viviana Fernandez, the Centre’s amiable Deputy Director, I knew that I was in excellent hands as arrived in the “enemy territory” of the University of Ottawa as a Carleton Professor. The Nigerian movie I was invited to discuss and contextualize for the audience is none other than “The Supreme Price”, the newly-released documentary by PRODUCED AND DIRECTED BY FILM MAKER, JOANNA LIPPER ABOUT HAFSAT ABIOLA-COSTELLO. THE FILM OFFERS a reappraisal of arguably the most tragic moment in the life of Nigeria after the civil war: the annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential election and the subsequent murder by Nigeria of Chief MKO Abiola and Mrs. Kudirat Abiola – the two protagonists of that intense national saga.

There are several reasons to salute and celebrate the release of this documentary directed by Joanna Lipper. As a postcolonial project, Nigeria is a country that has declared war on history and memory since October 1, 1960. Nigeria is a non-nation divided by religion, ethnicity, and numerous fault lines. Only two things unite her: football and a national aversion for remembering. In this national space, memory is more fugacious than a puff of powder. Every today declares war on every yesterday in Nigeria, determined to exterminate it as quickly as possible. My guess is that when a people defines nationhood as a succession of endlessly repeated self-inflicted errors and tragedies, history, memory, and remembering become deadly enemies to the extent that they are a mirror to a bazaar of wrong and tragic choices.

It is in this context of a national will to the erasure of memory that I salute Joanna Lipper, Hafsat Abiola-Costello, and all their collaborators in this project for taking us back to June 12, to the stories of MKO Abiola and Kudirat Abiola, and to the evolution of the pro-democracy movement and struggle in Nigeria. What Hafsat has done in this marvelous work is to draw Nigeria’s attention to the fact that we cannot re-member that nation until we remember; we cannot re-member Nigeria until remembering becomes one of the constant practices of nationhood.

The fast-paced plot of this documentary moves in several intertwined but non-linear loops as the perspectives of multiple narrators are woven into a vivid re-imagining of the sacrifice of MKO Abiola and Kudirat Abiola. Hafsat is the primary narrator. Her perspectives on the lives and struggle of her parents are amplified by the points of view of her siblings. Professor Wole Soyinka, my good friend, Dr. Joe Okei-Odumakin, and other avatars of the pro-democracy struggle, are equally given significant air time as narrators, offering their recollection of events and helping to flesh out the major themes of the documentary: the June 12 struggle, its afterlives, and the supreme price paid for democracy and the future of Nigeria by MKO Abiola and Kudirat Abiola.
One of Hafsat’s greatest achievements in this documentary is to sustain the legends that her parents have rightfully become but also to recast them for Nigeria and the world in their everydayness and human-ness. Those Nigerians who are not victims of our allergies to memory and remembering may still be familiar with the broad strokes of the June 12 debacle and the circumstances which led to the murder of MKO Abiola and Kudirat Abiola but very few of us have familiarity with the intimate spaces of that struggle. Hafsat and her siblings take us through the Abiola house hold. To see Chief MKO Abiola’s personal living quarters – his bedroom, his living room, his mosque; to see Kudirat Abiola’s personal spaces – her bedroom, her living room, her kitchen, etc, are moments of great solemnity and contemplation because you stand in awful realization of how much of our immediate history is tied to those private spaces.

What, to us, is an intensely public political story of sacrifice and heroism has other private dimensions that we don’t always immediately remember. By giving ample narrative space to her siblings, Hafsat confronts one with the sobering realization that we are dealing with children who lost both parents to the demons of Project Nationhood and who went through trauma and unimaginable adjustments. Our public tragedy is an intensely private tragedy for the Abiola children. But Hafsat is not going to allow tragedy have the last word in this captivating recording of her parents’ struggle and sacrifice for Nigeria.

Hence, a theme of the triumph of hope and the nobility of struggle and sacrifice runs through the documentary. You are pleased by the narration of what Kudirat Abiola overcame and achieved in her life. Hers is a powerful and inspirational story of challenges and triumphs in life. I do not want to tell too much of the story here lest you find an excuse not to go to the movie theatre and watch the documentary.

But no reaction to the documentary would be complete without mentioning Hafsat’s elder brother, the humorous anti-hero who appears determined to fray the nerves of the western audiences of the documentary. His Islamic identity is paramount for him but in numerous instances of narrative excess and élan, he hovers dangerously around the borders of fundamentalism in terms of his curious rendering of Islam as antithetical to the political advancement of women. Hafsat’s love story – how she met her husband, shots of their apartment in Brussels, shots of their two lovely children – is one of the highpoints of the documentary for in it we see how she balances family with her own struggles to sustain and build on the legacy of her parents through KIND – the Kudirat Initiative for Democracy.

In introducing this interesting dimension of the intermesh between her family life and her own rise as an activist, Hafsat employs humour to great effect. We are told that Chief Abiola always warned his sons never to come back home with a white wife. Since he did not extend that warning to his daughters, Hafsat found an auspicious loophole and Mr. Costello got lucky. Of course, this part would not be complete without her elder brother telling us that the only thing that mattered to him was Mr. Costello’s conversion to Islam.

Watching the documentary and witnessing Hafsat’s narrative poise, her command of issues, her delivery, her leadership of KIND and her work as a commissioner in Ogun state, I suddenly had an aha moment! I’ve been an advocate of the idea of a female president for Nigeria for a very long time. Long before President Obasanjo recruited her on a journey that would progressively diminish her capital with the Nigerian people – not because she agreed to serve but because of her conduct on the job – I used to salivate over the prospects of an Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala presidency. Today, she is recruited to mount podiums by TAN to tell lies and manufacture employment figures for the public on behalf of President Jonathan. With Okonjo-Iweala reducing herself to a sorry instrument of cheap propaganda and lies, I have lately been salivating over the prospects of an Oby Ezekwesili presidency during my lifetime.

Hafsat Abiola-Costello joined Oby Ezekwesili in my imagination as I watched and admired her in the documentary. Wait a minute, this is also a presidential material just like Oby, I said to myself. MKO Abiola and Kudirat Abiola are a story that is still being unfolding. A president Hafsat Abiola-Costello somewhere in the future of Nigeria would be such an auspicious denouement to the Abiola saga. A Hafsat presidency is the price that Nigeria owes the Abiolas for their supreme sacrifice, I thought. It would also be a great way to make up for the added tragedy and insult of attempting restitution via Obasanjo. The Obasanjo presidency, which the usual suspects in Nigeria somehow manufactured as restitution, was nothing but a mockery of the supreme sacrifice of the Abiolas.

Not so fast! That was Hafsat’s elder brother interrupting my thoughts as I allowed my imagination to play with the idea of a President Hafsat Abiola-Costello during the screening. Hafsat can try to be anything but President, he says. In Islam, any country or nation led by a woman shall not prosper or succeed. And he quotes the Koran to support such retrogressive ideas. He concludes that he’d never support his sister if she ran for president. I looked across the dark movie room in an attempt to see if I could catch the face of my colleague, Professor Nduka Otiono, in the room. I knew that he would be wincing in discomfort as I was. What is this Canadian audience thinking now that they have been told that Islam is opposed to the idea of women leading a nation? That women have led more Muslim-majority countries than Christian-majority countries in recent memory did not seem to bother Hafsat’s brother as he boisterously makes his claim: Benazir Bhutto, Megawati Sukarnoputri, Tansu Ciller, etc.
Well, some Monday for sure, I know I will be rooting for a Hafsat Abiola-Costello presidency in Nigeria. However, there is one area in which Hafsat needs to worry about me. We hear snippets of her conversations in Yoruba in the documentary. Hafsat speaks very good Yoruba, delivered in her hybdrid Briticana (her English accent appears to me to be an admixture of Britico and Americana that I am calling Briticana). The Yoruba I hear in the documentary carries a heavy whiff of Briticana. She speaks that Yoruba through her nose. Hafsat has spent enough time back home now to lose that Briticana and speak proper daughter of the shoil Yoruba. If she does not lose the Briticana, I will use it to campaign against her when she runs for president! I do not want to hear Briticana Yoruba when I say “e kaaro ma” to President Hafsat.

________________

Pius Adesanmi, PhD (UBC, Vancouver)
Professor
African Literatures and Cultures
Department of English Language & Literature
Carleton University
1125 Colonel By Drive
Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.

Disclaimer

It is the policy of NewswireNGR not to endorse or oppose any opinion expressed by a User or Content provided by a User, Contributor, or other independent party. Opinion pieces and contributions are the opinions of the writers only and do not represent the opinions of NewsWireNGR.