There is a joke I shared several years ago on this page of a lavish society wedding after which the couple retired home to commence their honeymoon. At bed time, as the man joined his wife and attempted to consummate the relationship, she withdrew from under the pillow a court injunction perpetually restraining the husband from claiming “all his entitlements”. What made the “report” believable, as I said at the time, was that the said injunction was obtained from a court in Abuja, a city notorious for breeding judges for whom “justice” is a commodity that can be traded even on the Stock Exchange.
The point here is that the judiciary is becoming a source of concern, especially in this election season, and there are undercurrents to suggest that some judges in Abuja are being primed to game the process. It is perhaps for that reason that the recent admonition by the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Mahmud Mohammed, is instructive. He said: “Let me use this opportunity to sound a note of warning to all judicial officers. Do not allow any political party or politician to compromise your integrity or your future. We must never again be used as tools to truncate our nation’s democracy.”
Certain things going on within the polity today remind us all of the orchestrated June 12, 1993 presidential election fiasco. One, there is a growing perception, as it was in the past, that the only way to get an incumbent out of power in Nigeria is through some form of negotiated exit, however unpopular such a leader may be. Two, there is currently a widespread but dangerous narrative that the incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan can only win the rescheduled election by rigging. So even if he secures more votes than his main opponent, Major General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd), in a credible process, the result would be disputed by those who have made up their minds that “Buhari has already won.”
Three, former President Olusegun Obasanjo has alleged that the president is determined to win the election by “hook or crook” or in the alternative, “go for broke” by scuttling the entire democratic process. Four, by counter-alleging that“Obasanjo’s plot with others inside and outside the country to thwart the general elections and foist an unconstitutional Interim National Government, which he hopes to head on the nation is well known to us”, the presidency has confirmed that rumours about ING are not totally unfounded. Five, a staff of a senior presidency official recently posted on a social media platform that if defeated, President Jonathan would rather hand over to the military than allow Buhari to take over power. Six, the All Progressives Congress (APC) has publicly stated that if it is “rigged out”, meaning if it loses the presidential election, the party would form a “parallel government”, an open invitation to anarchy.
Seven, and this is the critical point here, there are reports that some politicians and their agents are working the courts in Abuja to ensure either that the elections do not hold as rescheduled or that the Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) and Card Readers are not used, knowing that without them, it would be a matter of simply writing results with all the attendant consequences for the peace of Nigeria.
The sum total of the foregoing is that there are increasing signs that if care is not taken, our nation could be plunged into a serious crisis. That then explains why the next five weeks and two days (to the presidential election) have become crucial. The good bit though is that whatever anybody may say, this election is not being fought along, and would not be lost and won on the basis of, Nigeria’s traditional fault-lines. Indeed, what I find particularly interesting is that most of the people leading the political assault for the president are Northerners (and they are predominantly Muslims) while the political strategists around Buhari are from the South (and they are mostly Christians). The lesson here is simple: For the average Nigerian politician, whether from the North or from the South and regardless of the religion he/she professes, politics is more often about the pursuit of personal interests.
Now that a significant number of Nigerian prospective voters have been availed the opportunity to collect their PVCs, it is important for both the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the opposition APC to support the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in the bid to conduct credible elections. And that will not happen by clamouring to have INEC jettison the idea of using the PVCs and Card Readers or by embarking on a needless propaganda against the authorities, including President Jonathan. Neither is it in the interest of our country if those who once gleefully told Nigerians that the acronym for the name JEGA means Jonathan Ebele Goodluck Azikiwe continue to blackmail the INEC chairman with unfounded allegations.
While June 12 may mean different things to different people, what is not in doubt is that Nigerians paid an enormous price for the contrived and prolonged crisis that held back our country from peace and progress and for a long period divided our people. Therefore, for us to avoid going back down that unfortunate road, critical stakeholders must pay attention to Abuja courts. A word, as they say, is enough for the wise!
Message from Bush (Jnr)
Immediate past United States President, Mr. George Bush, who is currently promoting his new book, “41: A Portrait of My Father” (on his dad and former President George H.W. Bush), said last weekend: “I don’t think it’s good for the country to have a former president undermine a current president; I think it’s bad for the presidency for that matter.”
Bush said he has no interest in generating headlines for himself by bashing his successor. “Secondly, I really have had all the fame I want,” he continued. “And the truth of the matter is (that) in order for me to generate publicity I’d have to either attack the Republican Party, which I don’t want to do, or attack the president, which I don’t want to do. And so I’m perfectly content to be out of the limelight.”
I wish someone in our country would take that message.
A Question to Ponder
A few days ago, I was going through the files on my computer when I saw one titled “The happiest day of my life”. It was a school essay written by my second daughter. Out of curiosity, I decided to read the story which was about a family holiday, the only one we ever took together in the summer of 2013 to the Island of Zanzibar, a semi-autonomous territory in Tanzania. What made the trip so memorable for my daughter, according to what she wrote, was: “My dad travelled with us on holiday for the first time”.
Embedded in my daughter’s story is a subtle rebuke, perhaps even an indictment. I know they (and of course someone else!) have always canvassed that I should travel with them on holidays but then I have work to do, don’t I? After all, I make the money for them to enjoy such luxury that I never did as the son of a village carpenter. But I have also had to reflect on parenting in the age that we are in and after reading the internet story below which was recently posted on a listserv, I find the message so instructive that I reproduce it for readers. I hope it blesses you as much as it has blessed me:
In 1923, nine of the wealthiest people in the world met at Chicago’s Edge Water Beach Hotel. Their combined wealth, it is estimated, exceeded the wealth of the Government of the United States at that time. These men certainly knew how to make a living and accumulate wealth. Attending the meeting were the following men: 1. The president of the largest steel company; 2. The president of the largest utility company; 3. The president of the largest gas company; 4. The president of the New York Stock Exchange; 5. The president of the Bank of International Settlements; 6. The greatest Wheat Speculator; 7. The greatest “bear” on Wall Street; 8. The head of the World’s greatest monopoly and 9. A member of President Harding’s cabinet. That’s a pretty impressive line-up of people by anyone’s yardstick. Yet, 25 years later, where were those nine industrial giants?
Let’s examine what happened to them 25 years later: 1. The president of the then largest steel company (Bethlehem Steel Corp), Charles M Schwab, lived on borrowed capital for five years before he died bankrupt; 2. The president of the then largest gas company, Howard Hubson, went insane; 3. One of the greatest commodity traders (Wheat Speculator), Arthur Cutten, died insolvent; 4. Then president of the New York Stock Exchange, Richard Whitney, was sent to jail; 5. The member of US President Harding’s cabinet, Albert Fall, was pardoned from jail just to be able to go home and die in peace; 6. The greatest “bear” on Wall Street, Jesse Livermore committed suicide; 7. The president of the then world’s greatest monopoly, Ivar Krueger, also killed himself; 8. The president of the Bank of International Settlement, Leon Fraser, equally took his own life; 9. The president of the largest utility company, Samuel Insull, died penniless.
What those people forgot was how to “make life” while they got busy making money! Money in itself is not evil; it provides food for the hungry, medicine for the sick, clothes for the needy. However, money is only a medium of exchange. We need two kinds of education: One that teaches us how to make a living and another that teaches us how to live. There are many of us who are so engrossed in our professional life that we neglect our family, health and social responsibilities. If asked why we do this, we would reply that “we are doing it for our family”. Yet, our kids are sleeping when we leave home. And they are sleeping when we come back home! Twenty years later, we’ll turn back, and they’ll all be gone, to pursue their own dreams and their own lives.
Without water, a ship cannot move. But if the water gets into the ship, the ship will face disaster. What was once productive for the ship now becomes destructive. Similarly, we live in a time where earning is a necessity but let it not enter our hearts, so that what was once a means of living may not become a means of destruction for us as well.
So take a moment and ask yourself: “Has the water entered my ship?”
The Verdict Written By Olusegun Adeniyi and Culled from Thisday; olus...@thisdaylive.com
It is the policy of NewsWireNGR not to endorse or oppose any opinion expressed by a User or Content provided by a User, Contributor, or other independent party.
Opinion pieces and contributions are the opinions of the writers only and do not represent the opinions of NewsWireNGR.