Connect with us

Tech

U.S. Court Denies Apple’s Bid To Delay E-Books Damages Trial

Published

on

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Thursday rejected Apple Inc‘s bid to delay a July trial to determine damages after the company was found to have colluded to fix the prices of e-books.

In a brief order, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said the July 14 trial should proceed as scheduled, while Apple separately pursues its appeal of U.S. District Judge Denise Cote’s ruling that it conspired with five publishers to raise e-book prices.

Cote ruled last year after a non-jury trial that the conduct of the iPad maker impeded e-book competitors such as Amazon.com Inc.

More than two dozen state attorneys general joined the Department of Justice in suing Apple over e-books price fixing. Those states, as well as a group of consumers, are seeking up to $840 million (287 million pounds) in damages.

The exact amount of damages will be litigated before Cote at a trial scheduled for July 14.

A lawyer and a spokesman for Apple did not immediately comment on the order.

A spokeswoman for Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen, who is leading the case along with his Texas counterpart Greg Abbott, said, “We are pleased with the decision and continue to prepare for the upcoming damages trial.” A spokeswoman for Abbott also said he was pleased with the ruling.

The appeal of Cote’s liability finding is expected to last months. Apple has denied any wrongdoing.

Cote has also appointed a federal monitor to supervise Apple’s compliance policies. The company has strenuously objected to the monitor’s activities, calling them intrusive and too costly.

The five publishers previously agreed to pay more than $166 million to settle related antitrust charges. They include Lagardere SCA’s Hachette Book Group Inc, News Corp’s HarperCollins Publishers LLC, Penguin Group (USA) Inc, CBS Corp’s Simon & Schuster Inc and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH’s Macmillan.

The case is In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, U.S. et al. v. Apple Inc. et al., 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-3741.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Richard Chang)

Continue Reading
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. iphone 6 release date

    2014/06/04 at 4:12 pm

    I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but
    your sites really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to
    come back in the future. Cheers

  2. sonic Games

    2014/06/20 at 9:07 am

    Good learning algebra software offer fast and step wise explanation through
    sample problems. They will also have students from the Fuel Up To PLAY 60 program.
    Although there is much variation, most kindergartners are learning
    to count to 100, recognize the same two numbers and identify the distance between numbers.

    These are heavier weight papers and can be purchased at stores like Wal-Mart.

    The level of accuracy maintained is just awesome, thanks to several NASA engineers and scientists who
    worked hard to ensure the simulated moon mission is as realistic as
    possible.

    Just spend a number of minutes freely writing through the heart then get
    on while using rest of the day, leaving
    your unconscious to devour the learning. Each professional will usually reap a reward for efforts.
    sonic Games all math games
    By knowing who your audience is, you’ll have a newsletter that speaks directly
    in your readers. It is also advisable that not to bring
    in preconceived notions because the whole purpose
    will be lost under any such circumstances.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *